Your Relationship Dynamics
What you say about your partner reveals more about you than them.
Mikulincer & Shaver (2016) distinguish between what you say you want in a partner and how you act under pressure. Attachment in theory is classification: secure, anxious, avoidant. But attachment in live—how you negotiate intimacy, repair conflict, tolerate difference—is dynamic. A 'secure' person in stable relationship might collapse under change. An 'anxious' person can be brilliant when the other shows up. We listen for complexity, not labels.
What do we extract?
Your attachment style in action: how you seek proximity, handle separation, respond to perceived threat. Gottman's (1994) research on stable couples shows it's not absence of conflict, but repair quality. We measure how you navigate both.
Intimacy isn't just sex; it's vulnerability and being known. Autonomy within partnership isn't selfishness; it's self-preservation. When you talk about your partner, you reveal how you balance these. And contradictions—'perfect but isolated'—show the true pattern.
Attachment Style in Live Action
How you seek connection, what triggers anxiety, how you restore safety.
Repair Capacity
After conflict, how do you return? Real remorse, negotiation, or open wounds?
Autonomy vs Fusion
Do you preserve your space, friends, interests? Or does partner become everything?
Methodological foundation
We use the AAP (Afini Attachment Profile, Bilbao AI 2026) model as base: anxiety, avoidance and disorganization of adult attachment. But we extract conversationally, not via questionnaire. Mehl et al. (2006) Electronically Activated Recorder showed everyday conversation patterns predict relationship stability better than self-reports.
We analyze how you talk about conflict: sustained resentment or resolution? How you describe partner: with admiration or condescension? How you describe intimacy: gratitude or transaction? Gottman (1994) identified divorce predictors: criticism, contempt, defensiveness, stonewalling. Your language reveals which live in your relationship.
Key references
Mikulincer & Shaver (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). Guilford. • Gottman, J. M. (1994). What Predicts Divorce? Lawrence Erlbaum. • Mehl et al. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317(5834), 82.
How we use this
If your attachment is anxious, AI isn't distant or unpredictable; it's consistent and present. If avoidant, we don't invade; we respect space. If you speak about partnership with ambivalence, we detect and don't assume bliss. Calibration doesn't judge relationship; it accelerates clarity about what's real for you.
"Relationships need communication. Talk to your partner."
"Your pattern: anxious attachment with high abandonment worry, but he's avoidant. Your 'more communication' triggers his withdrawal. Need different tactics: validation of his space, initiatives from calm, not from anxiety."
Generic: ignorant. Calibrated: precise.
Understand your couple dynamic
No blame, no judgment. Just pattern and clarity.